Same Performance.
Full Control.

GDPval-AA v2 leaderboard · Elo

GDPval-AA v2 evaluates models on real-world work tasks and expresses performance as an Elo rating, anchored to a human baseline of 1,000 — higher is better.

Human baseline (1,000)

  1. Claude Fable 5.1
    1764

    Claude Fable 5.1

    Anthropic

    Elo rating: 1764

    Released: August 2026

    Anthropic’s currently strongest closed model — leads the ranking.

  2. Claude Opus 5
    1735

    Claude Opus 5

    Anthropic

    Elo rating: 1735

    Released: June 2026

    Anthropic’s new Opus flagship — a close second behind Fable 5.1.

  3. GLM 5.3 on Platte
    1676

    GLM 5.3 on Platte

    Z.ai

    Elo rating: 1676

    Released: August 2026

    Z.ai’s open flagship — ranks above GPT-6, and therefore above every OpenAI model. Runs on Platte’s own infrastructure in Europe, under European law.

  4. Qwen 3.8 on Platte
    1628

    Qwen 3.8 on Platte

    Alibaba

    Elo rating: 1628

    Released: August 2026

    Alibaba’s open flagship — also still above GPT-6. Served on Platte in Europe, under European law.

  5. GPT-6
    1580

    GPT-6

    OpenAI

    Elo rating: 1580

    Released: August 2026

    OpenAI’s frontier model — ranked below the open models GLM 5.3 and Qwen 3.8.

  6. Gemini 3.8 Flash (high)
    1464

    Gemini 3.8 Flash (high)

    Google

    Elo rating: 1464

    Released: August 2026

    Google’s efficient Flash model in its high-reasoning mode — clearly above the human baseline, but behind the frontier.

  7. Mistral Medium 3.5
    875

    Mistral Medium 3.5

    Mistral

    Elo rating: 875

    Released: November 2025

    The mid-tier offering of Europe’s largest model maker — the only model shown below the human baseline of 1,000.

Chart: artificialanalysis.ai · As of: September 4, 2026 · All models shown are the current top models of their respective companies.

Models on Platte

Current model lineup, on EU infrastructure

Every model runs on Platte in European data centres, under European law. Intelligence and cost per task are measured by Artificial Analysis, independently of the model makers.

GLM 5.3

Z.ai

Intelligence
45
Avg. cost per task
$2.01
Input / output
€2.00 / €5.20 per 1M tokens
Context window
1M tokens
  • Reasoning

GLM 5.3 Flash

Z.ai

Intelligence
42
Avg. cost per task
$0.28
Input / output
€0.60 / €1.20 per 1M tokens
Context window
1M tokens
  • Reasoning
  • Image Vision

Qwen 3.8 2.4T (A95B)

Alibaba

Intelligence
40
Avg. cost per task
$2.16
Input / output
€3.00 / €6.50 per 1M tokens
Context window
262K tokens
  • Reasoning

Qwen 3.8 Flash Next

Alibaba

Intelligence
40
Avg. cost per task
$0.37
Input / output
€0.60 / €1.20 per 1M tokens
Context window
256K tokens
  • Reasoning
  • Image Vision

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash

DeepSeek

Intelligence
39
Avg. cost per task
$0.27
Input / output
€0.75 / €2.50 per 1M tokens
Context window
1M tokens
  • Reasoning
  • Image Vision

DeepSeek V4 Flash (0731)

DeepSeek

Intelligence
34
Avg. cost per task
$0.22
Input / output
€0.60 / €0.90 per 1M tokens
Context window
1M tokens
  • Reasoning

Intelligence, cost per task, context window and capabilities: Artificial Analysis (Intelligence Index v4.3.2, each at maximum reasoning effort), as of October 14, 2026. Artificial Analysis computes the cost per task at its own reference prices in US dollars — it compares the models with each other and is not the price on Platte.

Prices for the API and extra usage: Platte price list, as of September 21, 2026, excl. VAT.